Remember Yahoo!? There was a point in time when they were pretty cool. I have to admit, I can’t remember the last time I went to a Yahoo! affiliated website. There’s definitely a growing collection of basket-case tech companies, with Yahoo! and RIM most notably in there. It seems increasingly likely there’ll be need for a bigger basket, soon, to fit HP in as well.

Ahem, I digress. So, Yahoo! management sent out a reassuring memo to staff, but it’s in corporate-speak, so I thought I might summarise it a little. I’ve grabbed the text from All Things D’s article, here, so you don’t have to flip back and forth.

Dear Yahoos:

In our recent all hands meeting, we talked about the Board’s strategic review to help return the Company to a path of robust growth and industry-leading innovation. While our teams are working to evaluate the many opportunities by which Yahoo! can continue building on our success, all kinds of people have been — and will continue — speculating in the media about where that work is headed, so we thought it best to provide you with some additional context directly from those of us who are closest to it. We don’t have specific news to share with you today, but we are committed to communicating with you directly from time to time — especially given the level of external swirl — so that you know where we are in the process. You can expect periodic updates from us and we encourage you to communicate with us as well.

Hi!

At the heart of what we are doing is our belief that Yahoo!’s core strengths are not only relevant to where users are going today, but can serve as a foundation for the next phase of our company’s growth. Consider our strengths: we have 680 million users worldwide. We have nine of the #1 properties in the U.S., and we are a leader in display advertising. Our brand is iconic — we are not the only ones who bleed purple. By whatever measure you want to use — engagement, quality of products and services, our value to our advertisers — we all feel that we have what it takes to succeed. Also, our Asia assets remain one of our top priorities and we continue to work well with the teams there. As you may have seen, Alibaba Group has just announced a liquidity event for its employees that reflects a continued appreciation in its value, and therefore of the value of our stake.

By “growth”, we mean “shaving slices off like we’re in the deli business”. Henceforth, as well, whenever we use the word “we”, we mean the “royal we”.

What Yahoo! needs to do better — and we’ve talked about this — is accelerate innovation, reignite inspiration, and give our users what they want now — great content that is engaging and easy-to-use on any device and provides an experience in which they can participate and contribute. Perhaps most importantly, we need to anticipate what they will want next. That is the path to enhancing the value of Yahoo! for all of its stakeholders, including its users, customers, shareholders, partners and Yahoos everywhere. Our strategic review is designed to help us map out the best way to achieve that.

Think faster, and smarter!

At this point, we cannot offer many specifics about the Board’s review; we’ve just gotten started. You should know that the entire Board and management team are fully aligned and unanimous in their views regarding the scope of this work. Allen & Company was a logical choice to help us in this review, because they have been one of our advisers for some time, and this is familiar territory for them. Achieving success in our sector is intrinsic to what they do for a living, and they will be constructive partners.

We don’t know what we’re doing yet.

Our advisers are working with us to develop ideas that we will pursue proactively. At the same time, they are fielding inquiries from multiple parties that have already expressed interest in a number of potential options. We will take the time we need to select and structure the best approach for the company, its shareholders and employees.

We’re paying some people lots of money to tell us who in the company we should sell to another company. You’re all OK, with that, right? Cool.

In addition, as we announced previously, the Board has commenced a search for a permanent Chief Executive Officer. That process also continues.

We can’t find anyone who wants the job. Hang on, is that Apotheker dude free now? Does anyone have his number?

When we have updates that we can share we will do so. There will be plenty of rumors and speculation as different parties try to advance their agendas in the media — but it is important that we not be distracted by the rumors and speculation.

DON’T LOOK BEHIND THE CURTAIN! DON’T LOOK BEHIND THE CURTAIN! WE FORBID YOU TO LOOK BEHIND THE CURTAIN!

You are instrumental to the success of our business — we can’t do it without you. While we will move with a sense of urgency, this process will take time. Months, not weeks. We know that’s a lot of potential distraction, but we believe it will be worth the wait. We are forging a path to a next phase of growth for Yahoo! that feels like our best days: fun, full of possibility, and always in search of how to deliver the new thing people want from us. Together, we can write the next great chapter in the Yahoo! story and secure our place as one of those rarities: an internet company that endures.

Please don’t quit. The only tangible assets we have left for sale are you!

 

You want to go on a rant about how one platform is better than the others and that anyone who believes otherwise is a mindless zombie captured by the marketing forces of the company you currently loathe?

I’ve got news for you, fanboy.

Yes, fanboy. You’re a fanboy. You use the word derisively against others who disagree with your point of view, failing to see that in doing so, you become the worst sort of fanboy yourself – a hypocritical one.

What am I?

I’m a technologist, and I’m proud of it. What’s a technologist? Let me answer that by telling you what I appreciate:

  1. I appreciate that before any other computer company, Apple grasped that computers should become consumer tools.
  2. I appreciate that Microsoft came up with a strategy to commoditise and simplify administration of previously annoying infrastructure components, like printing, file serving and email.
  3. I appreciate that Solaris was the sort of easy-to-use Unix that led it to be hugely popular in a plethora of businesses.
  4. I appreciate that AIX pioneered strong Unix security models.
  5. I appreciate that OpenVMS not only demonstrated excellent file versioning decades ago, but also gave us clustering technology so rock-solid that there are clusters that have uptimes of more than 12+ years.
  6. I appreciate that Linux fundamentally altered the server industry.
  7. Indeed, I appreciate that every operating system has (for its time) had something praiseworthy about it, and has equally had something to castigate it about.
  8. I appreciate that midrange virtualisation proved the mainframe approach to resource sharing and segregation was right all along – we were just waiting for technology to catch up.
  9. I appreciate that in any healthy market there must be multiple competitors.
  10. I appreciate that we are now in a period of computing where we’re standing on the shoulders of the giants who came before us.
You want to disagree with the above? Go right ahead, fanboy.
 

Microsoft Word. It’s like the Kill-O-Zap of Word Processing.

“The designer of the gun had clearly not been instructed to beat about the bush. ‘Make it evil,’ he’d been told. ‘Make it totally clear that this gun has a right end and a wrong end. Make it totally clear to anyone standing at the wrong end that things are going badly for them. If that means sticking all sort of spikes and prongs and blackened bits all over it then so be it. This is not a gun for hanging over the fireplace or sticking in the umbrella stand, it is a gun for going out and making people miserable with.’”

(Restaurant at the End of the Universe, Douglas Adams.)

The problem with Microsoft Word is that there’s no right ends. They’re all wrong ends.

Word Infographic

 

There’s little more frustrating as a customer than hearing stupid reasons as to why something can’t be done.

For instance, I tweeted with some humour this morning:

Ahah. After multiple unsubscribe attempts, my mail client is automatically classifying @sitepointdotcom emails as spam. #sweetjustice

I was amused and pleased at such developments. While I’ve purchased Sitepoint books in the past – both electronic and physical – I’ve paid the price in a seemingly never ending stream of “special offer” emails. Around December last year this picked up when they ran a special a day leading up to xmas, and it was at that point that I attempted my first unsubscribe.

Then in January I did another unsubscribe.

Then in March or so I did another unsubscribe.

In July, fed up with unsubscribes that never got anywhere, I replied to yet another “special offer” with the following:

Hi Sitepoint folks,

While I appreciate your continued messages, I have in the past filled out “unsubscribe” forms, particularly after the large volume of emails sent out either earlier this year or late last year when you were doing a special every day.

Perhaps you could double check and remove me from your email lists?

Cheers,

Preston.

When I tweeted about it, I was of course targeting Sitepoint’s attention, because while they were now being classified as my email system as spam, it was a general annoyance that it had reached this point – as far as I’m concerned, it’s bad corporate manners to keep on emailing customers who ask repeatedly to be removed. A bit like Dell and their seemingly miraculous ability to provide three methods of unsubscribing on every physical mail-out and not every honouring any of them.

So, Sitepoint’s twitter account responded with:

@backupbear I could have sorted that for you painlessly if you tweeted. ;) ^hawk

To which I replied:

@sitepointdotcom I’d have thought unsubscribe requests would have been sufficient.

And very shortly thereafter, I got the “we’re too inept to use electronic systems” response:

@backupbear We have several lists. Newsletters, sales, courses etc. All are separate so it gets messy. Legacy issues. :( ^hawk

Here’s the rub: I don’t want to hear about your legacy systems, or why you’re having problems unsubscribing me. I really don’t care. In fact, I don’t give a damn. It’s about as interesting to me as watching paint dry, or a fly race. Why? Because it’s a simple process, even if your systems don’t allow automation: if a customer sends an unsubscribe request, then someone should step through the “legacy” systems and manually unsubscribe them.

And here’s where it gets really simple, especially for Australian based companies like Sitepoint: under the SPAM Act (2003), it becomes classified as spam, and potentially subject to fines if you continue to send unsolicited emails to people after they’ve requested they be removed from your system.

Don’t give me a rubbish answer about legacy systems. Fix your process (or develop one!) and stop breaking the SPAM act.

 

I do enjoy my Apple products, but I have to say OS X’s behaviour with DNS leaves me in a permanent state of annoyance. This is not a problem I have with any other hosts on my local network. All the Windows, Linux and Solaris machines in my environment, with the same DNS configurations, have absolutely no problem whatsoever.

Some engineer or engineers at Apple responsible for name resolution coding in OS X, as far as I’m concerned, are deserving of atomic wedgies for every day this ‘feature’ persists:

Name Resolution

So, I can resolve a hostname via official DNS tools (and before you ask, dig gives the same answer as nslookup), but if I then try to connect to the hostname, I’m told it doesn’t exist. And so, I’m told via a cat of /etc/resolv.conf that the file isn’t really used any more, and checking the network configuration:

Network Configuration

According to various Apple threads, this is likely to be caused by a nameserver not responding fast enough, and Apple dropping it from the nameserver search list, which can be restored by killing/restarting mDNSResponder. But no, that doesn’t resolve the problem and, I only have one DNS server for my home environment – and it’s all on the same LAN, so there’s not any latency issues. Certainly no other hosts on the network (virtual or physical) has problems. Just the OS X hosts. In fact, not even the iOS devices have name resolution problems. Just the OS X servers.

You may ask – why haven’t I posted this on an Apple support forum? I’d answer with – why would I bother? After all, I’m increasingly finding that OS level support forums for the most part are overrun with pretentious gits who are actually more interested in pointing out why you should be doing something differently than answering your questions. That’s why I’ve given up asking questions in them.

No thanks, I don’t a bunch of people to tell me that I should just remember to type “.local” at the end of every bloody hostname in order to use bonjour name resolution instead. I. Just. Want. DNS. To. Work.

Is that too much to ask?

 

So being the eager computer user that I sometimes am, I did a first day upgrade of my laptop and my Mac Pro to Lion.

I have to say, I’m rather disappointed. In fact, I can easily name 7 things that I’m fairly unhappy with:

  1. First off, there’s the spaces glitching that I’m noticing on the Mac Pro that leaves me feeling grumpy.
  2. WiFi is very poor. My laptop, which never once had connectivity issues to my home WiFi, has put me through hell several times already when I switch from ethernet to WiFi.
  3. Spotlight. Sure, I can now search while indexing, but why does it have to reindex everything on every reboot? In this, Lion is looking more like Tiger.
  4. Safari #1. Um, yeah. It’s nice and fast, but buggier than it has been in ages. Hanging tabs should theoretically it seems be isolated from others, but instead one hanging tab causes all the others to go blank. Bleuch.
  5. Safari #2. Where’s the option to disable auto-reload of every previously open tab? Whose smart idea was it that every person wants every tab to reload on every launch? What happens if one of those tabs is opening to a crash/buggy page? Bleuch^2. (No, turning off the “Restore windows when quitting and re-opening apps” setting in General Preferences does not seem to make a difference here.)
  6. Mail. I can change every font except for the large and bulky font used for Mailbox list. Thanks Apple, I really want to know what sort of Fonts I’ll be using when I’m 70 have have vision impairment problems!
  7. Third party manufacturers need a kick in the pants. OK, this isn’t technically Apple or Lion’s fault, but with my Mac Pro, I have a Sonnet E2P eSATA PCI card, and a NewerTech USB<->Wireless dongle. Neither work. Yes, I could have checked for compatibility, but given these are both still being sold, and Lion has been kicking around in development for some time, I expect better. The chances of me buying any NewerTech or Sonnet equipment every again have plummeted.
So far this has been my least enjoyable Apple OS upgrade experience ever. I hear they’re skipping 10.7.1 and have already seeded 10.7.2 to developers. Hopefully that’ll fix some of these issues.
 

Honestly, Lion was in beta testing for how many months, and I have to put up with this shit when switching spaces? And no, I’m not the only one – other users are reporting it, and a quick Twitter survey even for me confirmed it.

I switch spaces hundreds of times a day. 10.7.1 better fix this, or I’ll be an angry bear:

How many other people is this driving nuts?

10.7, MacPro3,1 with NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT card. Nothing out of the ordinary!

(NB: If video doesn’t load, either reload the page or view the original here on YouTube.)

 

While I regularly use and frequently praise open source software, there’s a cowboy element to it which often gives it a bad name. That’s the element that, for instance, sees some poor newbie (or even some experienced person) ask on a forum, “How do I do X”, and then has 50+ sanctimonious smart arses chime in to explain why someone would either be stupid to do that in the first place, or stupid for asking and not already knowing, etc.

That cowboy attitude also leads to this shite:

Firefox ... upgrade from stable to beta?

I’d like to understand: where is the professionalism in recommending that you upgrade to a beta version of software for “security and stability”? Sure, I recognise betas may have more features – but stability is generally not one of them, and it’s not the sort of thing that an IT department would appreciate seeing popup on user desktops.

This is yet another manifestation of the open source cowboy attitude that actually does the community such a disservice.

If you’re going to ask people to beta test, be honest.

 

My career centres around enterprise level data protection, to the point that I wrote a book about it, and maintain a blog about it. I’m not talking security and anti-virus, though I have a typical paranoid IT person’s awareness of these items – I’m talking backing up and (if necessary) recovering your data.

Sometimes, once people find out what I do (“backup and recovery”) they ask me how they can best backup at home. This is something that I sometimes struggle to advise in, simply because I tend to take an enterprise approach even to home data protection. So, I’m not going to make my tips about “You should use program X” or “You should use cloud provider Y” – choosing what to use is different from knowing how to do it.

So, that being said, I can give you 10 key tips to keeping your home data safe:

  1. Keep yourself organised.Honestly, this is the most important thing you can do – have a logical and consistent layout to where you store your data. Don’t just dump things on your desktop and hope to sort them out later, or save files to whatever random folder a File|Save dialog box offers. Have a directory/folder structure that is organised enough to make sense to you, without being so anal retentive that it drives you nuts and you start to disregard it.
  2. Know how much you’re backing up. You need to get an understanding of how much data you’ll be backing up. Are you just going to be backing up your email and documents, or your iTunes library all the videos you’ve taken, all the photos you’ve taken, etc.? You can’t make a decision about what backup product to use if you don’t know how much data you’ll be backing up.
  3. Know how much it’ll cost. Classic example – some people just blithely back up to the ‘cloud’ – i.e., over the internet, to something like Mozy or Crashplan. This might be OK for you if you’ve got a small amount of data, but if you’ve got a lot, then bear in mind that you may blow out your upload limits, or take months to complete. When it comes to backup, cost appears in at least two ways: literal dollar value, and amount of time taken. Be aware of both.
  4. Some apps require special backups. For instance, if you’re using Microsoft Outlook or something like that, you can’t backup your mail while your mail program is active. Ask around, or touch base with IT people who use the same platform as you, and find out whether it’s safe to back your application data up while the apps are running.
  5. It’s not a backup if it’s not tested. Don’t just run whatever backup process or program you choose to use and blindly trust that it’ll recover the data when you need. Do some test recoveries when you’re first setting up to reassure yourself it can be done, and then try to remember every now and then to do a test recovery to make sure it’s still looking OK.
  6. It’s better to backup a little bit more than not quite enough. This is typically the very first thing we learn in data protection. Don’t go crazy and backup stuff you know you’d never recover, but on the other hand, if you’re not 100% sure of something, err on the side of caution. It’s better to use a few extra GB of backup space than to find out later you really, really needed something that you’ve now lost.
  7. Backups should be automated. As a backup consultant, the best thing I think Apple ever introduced into their operating system was Time Machine. It allows for fully automated backups to run every hour, with an easy to use recovery interface. One of the first things we learn in backups is that if you have to manually run a backup, it won’t get run. You don’t use your computer to back it up – you use it for the web, or photos, or social networking, etc. Make sure whatever backup option you come up with runs automatically. You should be able to see when it’s active, or easily check that it’s happened/have it report to you when it’s complete. If you can manually run a backup too – e.g., after you’ve just say, imported 30GB of photos – that’s good, but you need it to run automatically 99.9% of the time.
  8. Remember: Backup is Insurance. Doing a backup is like taking an insurance policy. You don’t get to the end of the year and think “damn, that was a waste of money, I never made a claim!” when you take out home and contents insurance. You think “Another good year”. Consider backup the same way.
  9. Is your backup safe? Safe has dual meanings here: is it safe from something that might take out your actual data? Do you for instance, store it right next to your computer? If so, then it’s safe from the hard drive in your computer failing, but it’s not safe from something affecting your house. Consider this when deciding how you’ll store your backup. The second meaning of safe is this: what if someone steals your backup, or it gets lost? (E.g., if your data is small enough that you’re just backing up to a portable hard drive.) If that backup contains your bank account details, etc., then you’re practically giving away information, unless you do some form of encryption.
  10. If you change backups, make sure to safely and securely dispose of the previous ones. You may even want to consider this in advance when choosing what sort of media you’re going to backup to. For instance, I made the mistake for a while of doing archival backup to DVD. When I was no longer doing this and needed to get rid of the DVDs, I had to scratch/destroy the surfaces of each one. With 800+ discs, that took a while:

Dead discs

 

 

Apple Magic Trackpad

 

I’ve been using the Apple Magic Trackpad since October 2010; it had already been out for a few months, and I was vacillating as to whether I’d get one or not. Sure, it looked nice, but I was already using the Magic Mouse (the most superb mouse I’ve ever used, I might add), I just couldn’t see the justification in going to the Magic Trackpad.

Yet, curiosity got the better of me and I lashed out in October to acquire one of the little beasties for my Mac Pro. Now, I also have a Mac Book Pro, which I use extensively, and so I’m very used to using a trackpad.

So now, around 7 months later, I’ve finally made a decision about the Trackpad.

It’s a dud. A version beautiful dud. There are three key flaws with the Magic Trackpad:

  • Jumping – The trackpad is incredibly sensitive to the touch. While you’re actually using it to move around, it’s reasonably accurate for coarse granularity; however, as soon as you lift your hand, you run the risk of jumping the cursor to a completely different location on screen. At least several times a day, I have my cursor jump across multiple windows, halfway across a 1920×1200 desktop – usually just before I’m about to make a pointer click. It’s slowly driving me nuts.
  • Accuracy – I said before, “it’s reasonably accurate for coarse granularity”; however, when it comes to fine granularity control, its effectiveness exponentially drops off. Video editing, for instance – frame by frame selection, is an exercise in extreme frustration.
  • RSI – I’ve suffered from RSI for years. The keyboards introduced by Apple a few years ago were miraculous, since with their minuscule key travel, they made typing a dream again. I had previously been using a Kinesis Ergo keyboard – the Apple keyboard allowed me to consign that to the dust. (See here for some details on that change.) However, after months of using the Magic Trackpad, I’m satisfied that it is extremely ergonomically unsound when you have to keep your hand on the unit for anything but the shortest period of time. I can comfortably keep my hand on a mouse with reasonably intensive work for periods of half an hour or more without even thinking about it. About five minutes is my upper limit on the Magic Trackpad. Five minutes before my fingers cramp up. Maybe it’s the angle, or maybe it’s the hand positioning compared to a regular trackpad on a laptop, but ergonomically, the Magic Trackpad is an exercise in pain.

Tomorrow I’ll be switching backover to the Magic Mouse, and keeping the Magic Trackpad as a spare.

Sorry Apple, this product is a dud.

© 2012 unsane Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha