I got a massively destructive email this morning:

Spam

How would I like unlimited hits to my website?

Well, Mr Spammer, I wouldn’t.

You see, unlimited hits would imply an infinite number of hits, which in term would imply an infinitely large server farm to actually serve those hits, which would likely collapse under the weight of its own gravity to form a supermassive black hole which would completely destroy the entire multiverse.

Much as I like hits on my website, I don’t want to be responsible for the destruction of existence itself.

So no, I might give that one a miss, thanks.

 

It’s fair to say that I am a large man. While that’s something that can be frequently admired in the bear community, it’s not something I’m particularly proud of, though I’ve learned to live with it. Maybe I’ll eventually manage to drop some weight, but I’ve had (no pun intended) bigger problems to deal with over the last 12 months than my ample size.

Being a big man though exposes me to a particularly nasty side of the fashion industry – that being:

Fat people don’t deserve good clothes.

Now, I’m not obsessed with my appearance in public. I like to not look frumpy or dishevelled, but past that I can put up with looking fairly plain, for the simple reason that it usually lets me blend into the background and partake in my favourite social past-time – observation.

What drives me nuts though is this that while thin, muscled or even just mildly plump people can get a large selection of clothing with often witty comments or cute cartoon characters on it through regular, department stores, the selection available to – well, let’s be frank – much larger people is about as exciting and interesting as being the recipient of a punch in the crotch from an angry monkey.

Let’s take a typical shirt from Target, for instance:

The Simple Fats

I’m not exclusively picking on target, either. In Australia the three main department stores that even deign to carry larger clothing are Big W, KMart and Target. None of them are any better than the other on this front.

Fat shirts from the more regular priced department stores come into 4 main categories:

  1. American Universities – No, I never attended Arizona State. I don’t give a flying fracas about it, or any other American University. I don’t have anything against them, but I don’t see why I need to wear them.
  2. Sporting – Because all fat people are either avid, unfulfilled sports fans, or it’s an expression of irony from the fashion industry – “Hey look, here’s a fat person wearing a shirt about sport. Ha! What a joke!”
  3. Motorbikes – Because all fat people ride motorbikes or get obsessed about them. Now, I admit since I’m growing a longer goatee I and have a mohawk I seem to get confused quite regularly as a bikie (including having someone, via a hacked Facebook account, recently contact me and call me a “bikie looking c_nt”), but to be perfectly honest, the last time I was on a motorbike was apparently when I was about two and a half years old.
  4. Ironic Sex – “Haha, a fat person pretending he’s sexy!” For example, the current one from Target, typically heterocentric: “Don’t worry ladies, there’s plenty to go around.”

There’s a psuedo-fifth class of shirt – the plain coloured shirt. However, these are one-use shirts; they’re designed to expand at least 16 sizes, or shrink 4 sizes, on the first wash.

If I want to get clothes that fit and I like the look of, I either have to go to specialist big mens stores (a rare breed of store, these days), overseas stores, or come up with my own custom design from online printing stores, such as Zazzle.

What’s the likelihood of me walking into a department store and picking up a reasonably priced larger mans shirt that doesn’t fall into one of those four main categories above? I’ve got buckleys. Maybe I should be thankful. Ten years ago the only fat shirts that you could get either had vertical or horizontal stripes – both explicitly designed to make you feel like a walking sack of shit.

Still – it could be worse; I guess if I were as thin as the waifs that stagger up and down the catwalk looking like they’re one step away from total collapse, I’d not be able to go outside in anything more than a mild breeze.

I don’t think that it’s too much to ask for that department stores actually stock the same styles of clothes in the 3XL+ range that they do in the XXL and under range. Surely, in a period where every business needs to trim costs, it would be easier to employ one set of designers working on clothes for the entire range, rather than a quirky and cool set of designers for the XXLs and under, then a sarcastic, bitchy and nasty set of designers for the 3XL+ range? Surely this would also help morale at these clothing companies?

Well, you’d think so, anyway.

 

I’m frequently staggered by the inability of vendors, large and small, to provide decent search capabilities on their websites. This routinely happens across the entire spectrum of vendors, from hardware to OS to application, large and small. Search is not supplied by providing a search field and button somewhere in the header or footer of each generated web page – instead, it’s actually what goes on in the background that’s really important.

You know, the searching bit.

The indexing bit.

The text comparison bit.

This is something that I’m not convinced LaCie have understood:

LaCie Website

So I searched for “Thunderbolt” from the main page. Given the huge rotating graphic on the front page twice mentions Thunderbolt (one such mention pictured), there’s going to be some results, surely?

…cue crickets chirping…

LaCie Search Results

Yes, I know I could have actually clicked the Thunderbolt product on the main page; but that’s not necessarily intuitive if you’re a consumer who wants to know about all the Thunderbolt options a company has.

Left hand, meet right hand.

Shake, please.

 

There are four really common rebuttals to homosexuality touted by various religions, and given that not only are homophobic men are very likely to be aroused by homosexual behaviour, but homophobic rebuttals tend to have minimal to no logic in them, I thought it worthwhile running through those four arguments – what they say, and what I hear when they say it.

Argument one:

What you say / what I hear 1

Argument two:

What you say / what I hear 2

Argument three:

What you say / what I hear 3

Argument four:

What you say / what I hear 4

So, be aware! If you try one of those arguments on me, you know now what I’ll be thinking.

 

The extreme right, bigots, bogans, and other suppressors of social advancement often spout the nonsense that gays, lesbians, transexuals, intersexed and bisexual folk are after special rights when we talk about sensitive issues, such as say, the right to marry.

Since this is seemingly a really difficult concept to understand, I’ve decided to flowchart it. After all, flowcharts make complex and difficult decision processes much easier to understand.

Introducing the Flowchart

In case you’re confused, this is how you work out whether the GBLTI community are asking for special or equal rights:

Special Rights vs Equal Rights Flowchart

So that there’s absolutely no confusion, I’ll provide two examples for the use of this flowchart.

Example 1: Asking for the right to randomly fondle strangers in public

Now, imagine if you will, a situation where the GBLTI community were actively campaigning for the right to fondle strangers in public. No, they’re not, this is just an example.

In this situation, the flowchart would guide us as follows:

Example 1: Asking for the right to randomly fondle strangers in public

The flowchart works! It clearly tells us that such a campaign would be a request for special rights, because it’s something that heterosexuals aren’t currently allowed to do.

Example 2: Asking for the right to marry the person we love

A current trending issue is that of same-sex marriage. That’s where the GBLTI community is asking for the right to marry the person they love. This flowchart would look like the following:

Example 2: Asking for the right to marry the partner we love

Wrapping Up

As you can see, even the most complex of conundrums, such as working out whether the GBLTI community are asking for special or equal rights, can be solved with a flowchart.

 

Not Gay

I’d heard about this study ages ago, and at the time it just seemed deliciously ironic. However, the last 15 years has well and truly proved to me that there’s a strong element of truth to it, too. After all, we’ve all heard about:

  • Ex-gay groups headed by gay men who supposedly overcome their desires, only to come out years later.
  • Pastors who lead churches that can “deliver” people from homosexuality, then take young men on trips overseas and “deliver” them happy endings.
  • Fire and brimstone preachers who end up getting caught with a $30 male prostitute … ahem … taking one for the team.
  • Politicians who pass anti-gay laws then get discovered looking for sex in urinals at airports.
  • Politicians who pass anti-gay laws and write papers called “Growing Up Straight: What Families Should Know About Homosexuality”, then hire rent boys to “carry their luggage”.

The list just goes on and on. There’s quite a few public lists out there that are worth checking out, such as this one, this one, and this one.

There are always titillating stories in the gay community of known politicians, sports people, etc., who don’t necessarily have the most gay-welcoming of public stances but privately lead a double life. Some of these stories undoubtedly are wishful thinking, but some are 100% accurate.

Now, returning to the study I mentioned at the start…

Someone tweeted about it this week, kindly reminding me of it (though I’ll admit I’ve unkindly forgotten who it was who sent it around – if it was you, let me know). It was conducted in 1996, and was titled: “Is homophobia associated with homosexual arousal?

Quoting from the abtract:

“The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in exclusively heterosexual men who admitted negative affect towards homosexual individuals.”

They broke the study up into two groups – a collection of 35 men who were homophobic, and a collection of 29 men who had no issue with gays.

They then proceeded to show the men “stimuli” – aka, “porn”, of 3 varieties: regular heterosexual porn, gay male porn, and lesbian porn. As would be expected, both groups got rather excited about the heterosexual porn and lesbian porn.

However, what was the real corker – and something just about anyone in the gay community would attest to – was that the homophobic men were the only group to get aroused about gay male porn. That’s right:

“Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or denies.”

So, next time some guy starts blathering on homophobically about gays, just ask yourself this one question:

Is he a top, or a bottom?

 

Remember all those inspirational/warning posters that various wildlife and conservation societies used to spread around? They sort of looked like this:

When we're done with EarthWell thanks to NASA, we’re doomed.

Yep, they’ve gone and found an Earth like planet in the Goldilocks zone of a relatively nearby star (600ly away). Kepler 22b.

So all those inspirational posters?

The tea-partiers, the republicans, the climate change skeptics, the Liberal party, the Bachmanns and the Palins of the world – they’re going to resurrect those posters, and they’re going to insist we keep going just the way we are because hell, there really IS now another planet to move to when we’ve finished wrecking this one.

We’re screwed.

 

In case it’s not been immediately obvious to anyone, I’ve done some simple diagrams to explain where RIM went wrong in this catastrophic outage they’ve been suffering.

You see, most companies implement what we call redundant infrastructure. In systems that require high availability, this is often accomplished with something as simple as clustered (either LAN or WAN) hardware and communications. Sometimes it’s designed that each component runs at the same time, sharing the load, but if one fails, the other one takes over and runs all the load. In simple terms, it looks like this:

Active/Active ClustersThat all makes sense, right?

Unfortunately, RIM seemed more focused on having failover capabilities for upper level management, so it instead clustered its’ CEOs:

RIM Clustered CEOsThe supposed theory behind this is that the two CEOs, working in an active/active arrangement, could handle load better and get the job done better than a single CEO – and provide resiliency!

Unfortunately though, the hardware resiliency wasn’t as up to scratch, and when it started to fail, RIM started having a catastrophic outage.

Now, you may have expected at that point for the active/active CEO cluster to step in and help. Unfortunately though, they’ve barely been heard from. So, in cluster terms, we have to assume a sort of reversed split-brain situation has occurred, where both components of the cluster think the other component is still running:

RIM-splitbrainAnd there you have it – why RIM is having their current outage.

It’s also a lesson for all you other companies out there: you need fault tolerant infrastructure as well as CEOs.

 

 

I give you…

Muammar Gaddafi

They say the greatest humiliation that can happen to a dictator is when his people start laughing at him.

If any recent dictator is more ridiculous looking than Muammar Gaddafi, I’d be surprised.

 

I definitely have tendencies that left unattended can head in the direction of OCD. Clothes lines, in particular, are a headache for me. I have to work really hard to avoid a situation where any item of clothing hung up with more than one peg has to use the same coloured pegs.

So, since I keep an eye out for my OCD tendencies, I thought I’d make a quick list out to help others spot whether they too have OCD tendencies. Here it is:

  1. You start a list of 7 items and try to work out how to turn it into 10 items because that’s a nice even number.
  2. Not being able to work out a way to go to 10 items, you start writing the first item, but half-way through, go back and revisit this 10-item thing.
  3. You think a little more about how to make it a 10 item list by jotting down the first 7 items and trying to work out what you may have left off.
  4. You re-write the list in alphabetical order in case that helps you come up with something else.
  5. You re-write the list by apparent priority since alphabetical order didn’t help.
  6. Since re-writing by apparent order didn’t help, you go back and re-write into alphabetical order again.
  7. Then you notice a spelling error, so you re-write the list again.
  8. Once you finish writing the list, you realise an ‘s’ looks like a 5. You try to write over it but each time you do it looks worse, so finally you start writing the list all over again.
  9. Your pen runs out half-way through the rewritten list ,and not having another pen of exactly the same colour, you start afresh with the new pen.
  10. You realise you’ve done things similar to anything on this list.
© 2012 unsane Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha