Christopher Banks (aka @bipolarbear) has a great article at the moment, “David Farrier: Sex with dolphins and the ‘gay agenda’“, where he takes to task the notion that being closeted is in some way easy. In particular, referring to a New Zealand journalist, David Farrier, Christopher says:

To be fair, David isn’t the kind of guy who regularly shoves his sexuality down the throat of his readers.  But I’d like to see him try the following psychological exercise – and perhaps for some of you non-gay readers out there as well – to attempt to live a whole week without making any reference to your sexual orientation whatsoever.

I strongly recommend you read the above story – particularly when it comes to what Christopher says about how a heterosexual might go about walking in the shoes of a closeted person for a week. It’s 100% accurate, and 100% disturbing.

Closet door

However, it reminded me of a conversation I had with a close mate recently. He’s straight, has a bit of a wild-boy past, and is probably one of the most accepting people I’ve ever met. Pretty much nothing fazes him; indeed, he was one of the first non-gay people who found out Darren and I were in an open relationship – and he didn’t give a damn.

When I mentioned to my mate that I was having issues with depression, after the initial part of the conversation he remarked something along the lines of:

That must have been like coming out for a second time.

We had a bit of a discussion about it then, but it’s actually a common misconception amongst heterosexuals that gays and lesbians have a big coming out of the closet moment, then it’s all done and settled from that moment onwards. It’s certainly true that a lot of us will have a big coming out moment – usually to parents, relatives, or close friends (or some combination thereof), and this is indeed something that can be anything from amazingly positive to massively traumatic.

Coming out doesn’t stop there though. That first coming out is almost your own way of saying “I believe I am what I am”, but by no means is it the be-all and end-all for most gays and lesbians. We don’t just come out once – those of us who are able to live openly face coming out on almost a daily basis. Personally, I do think this leads to some people putting on affectations of campness, either in behaviour or speech, in order to short-cut the process.

Coming out can practically be a daily experience. In consulting, any time I go onto a customer site I’m likely to need to come out. Why? Because people naturally ask questions that come down to sexuality or relationship status. Here’s probably the most common questions I get asked of a non-technical nature during my first day on-site at a new customer:

  1. Do you have kids?
  2. Are you married?
  3. What does your wife do?

There is, quite simply, an implicit assumption amongst most heterosexuals that the people they meet are similarly heterosexual. When I was much younger, I’d generally answer the questions in a reasonably obtuse way:

  1. No, no kids.
  2. I’m partnered.
  3. My partner is a graphic designer.

Over time, as I became more comfortable with at least that part of me, and I became more confident in my career, I found it easier to answer:

  1. No, no kids – and never will.
  2. Not married, but I’ve been with my partner for 15 years.
  3. He’s a graphic designer.

Some would argue the second answer is still a cop-out, but in actual fact, it simply reflects my aversion for using a term that isn’t legally applicable (i.e., husband) – i.e., it’s not a case of me being closeted, it’s a case of me being anal retentive about language.

(First person to make a joke about being gay and anal retentive gets a withering glance.)

Outside of our jobs, we tend to be put in situations on a daily basis where we have the option of coming out. I don’t know how many times shop keepers have asked if Darren and I are brothers – or even twins! Even the most basic things – going out for coffee, or putting groceries down together at the supermarket provokes the classic: “Are you paying together?”

There are, quite simply, hundreds of little questions or comments or assumptions made by a large number of people each day that someone new they’re dealing with will be heterosexual. I want to make it very clear: I strongly believe that in 99% or more of the time, this is a subconscious situation. They’re not actively thinking “This person is likely heterosexual so I will …”

It’s because of those assumptions that discussing my depression wasn’t like coming out a second time; sure, it was akin to coming out, but I’ve come out so many times I’ve lost count. And I’ll likely continue to be coming out up until the day I die.

How often have you come out today?

 

The old idiom of “the journey of a thousand miles starts with a single step” doesn’t only just apply to physical journeys.

Yesterday was quite a surreal birthday. The day started with a plethora of people posting happy birthday greetings on my Facebook wall (that continued right through until this morning, in fact), and ended with a birthday dinner with my two best friends. On that definition, “surreal” doesn’t seem applicable, until you add in what I did in between … I went to my GP and started a conversation about my mental health. In particular, about my struggles with depression and my anger management.

Leading up to it, I was practically in two minds about it. Part of me was detached and content that the ball was going to start rolling, with a strong curiosity as to where the conversation would go. The other part of me was quite literally, terrified. That part of me would have traded the #112 tram ride with having to speak in front of 6,000 people in a conference about a backup product I’ve never used, in a heart beat.

Yet obviously I managed to avoid leaping off the tram at every stop (other than the correct one), quite likely for the simple fact that Darren was on the tram with me to offer support. And mercifully, when I arrived at the doctor’s, he was pretty much running on time. If I’d sat for an hour in the surgery the potential of chickening out would have likely started to rise.

It was almost soothing that I could start the conversation with a general medical question. The dryer climate in Melbourne is allowing a couple of allergies to resurface and for the first time in over a decade I had to ask for a prescription to deal with those allergies. So that was an ice breaker. It even had allowed me to start the conversation with “I’ve got two things I’d like to talk about, one simple, and one that’s a lot more challenging.”

And, as I’d been assured by a half dozen people or more, the conversation, once started, flowed remarkably easily. It was also quite clarifying for me. That analytical, reserved part of me, was able to process the general chatter and start nudging me in particular directions even as the conversation flowed. Even in that short consult – maybe thirty minutes or so – a lot of things gelled for me about where issues were springing from. We are ultimately conditioned with what we experience during childhood, and even that conversation linked back to something mentioned almost in an off-hand comment in the R U OK forum – my anger suppression likely comes from a time when I’d be incessantly teased but then castigated for getting angry … I was just being a bad sport. And so, other than a few eruptions when I completely lost control, I learnt while growing up that the way to deal with anger was to just bottle it all up. That’s not a solution though – in fact, it’s pretty toxic.

At a subconscious level, you could say that I already knew a lot of what was going to be discussed. Despite those moments of self-doubt (and sometimes, they come fairly regularly), I also know that I’m strongly introspective, articulate, and have an above average IQ. You can’t be in that position without having a good level of self-insight, and therefore I can’t say anything in the conversation took me by surprise.

Sometimes you just have to start the process with someone outside your “loop”.

I was particularly glad of one thing though – my doctor didn’t want me to go on anti-depressants. I think that was partly what had held me in reserve for so long from talking about it. I’m not knocking them – for some people, they’re so important and useful they literally save their lives, and I have no doubt of it. Yet my entire job and most of my interests and pleasures lay entirely within the realm of my mind anyway. Chemically altering that has always left me with a profound concern that it would, subtly, be replacing me rather than fixing me. Again, that sounds judgemental towards anti-depressants – it’s not, it’s most definitely not. This is a personal thing, between me and the drugs, nothing else, and not reflected on anyone else. It’s the path I’ve taken.

Even that conversation was interesting – for people without a diagnosed condition, he’s seen anti-depressants as being something to be used to give someone the equilibrium to actually reach a point where they can ask for help.

In a long, hard and painful struggle, I’d already got to that point on my own.

So, I now have a referral to a psychologist to discuss depression and anger management, though I’m sure other things will come up as well. I also have a bunch of basic blood tests to do in case there’s contributing physical factors (hey, I’m in IT, and I’m not into sport … I’ll be surprised if it doesn’t show a vitamin D deficiency), and I’ve been put in front of a path that will, undoubtedly, be an interesting journey.

Lions and tigers and bears.

 

Heading into my 38th birthday, with a lot weighing on my mind in terms of equilibrium, I’ve spent a bit of time over the last few days reflecting, as much as anything, in the simple pleasures that we can take in life.

One of those great pleasures, for me, is the sight of a freshly opened vegemite jar, without the first smear of spread taken from it. It’s pristine – it’s untouched, and it’s full of happy childhood memories:

Simple pleasures

Equally, simple pleasures can come from comfortable media. Years and years ago, I watched, then went on to buy David Attenborough’s “The Private Life of Plants”, one of those truly stellar documentaries from a happier age when every sentence didn’t seem to end with “but the environment is f*cked and we’re all going to die”, as they do now.

Private life of Plants

Alas, in the first house we moved into together, on the day after we moved in, we were broken into, and one of our VCRs was stolen. In it was one of the videos from the series. I didn’t realise it at the time, and so while the VCR was replaced, the video wasn’t, and for years I’d stare wistfully first at the videos in ABC stores, then in more recent years, the DVDs of the series, but never quite bringing myself to buying them.

Today, wanting to give me a simple present*, but one with meaning to it, Darren came home with the Private Life of Plants on DVD, and so, as I type about my simple pleasures, I’m revisiting one on the TV, and starting to watch this much loved documentary again for the first time in almost 15 years.

One of the images I remember most from the brilliant movie, Amelie, is at the start where the narrator discusses Amelie’s pleasures in life. One of them? Running her hands through the baskets of lentils and pulses in the markets. I can close my eyes and see that scene with vivid clarity almost any time I want. And I think I can, because I like the notion of simple pleasures. Sure, there’s happiness to be found in complex activities, in adult activities, in a plethora of other activities. But there’s truth to the notion of stopping to smell the roses.

Or getting to be the person who opens the vegemite jar.


* I had, after all, got a new laptop a couple of months ago which was designated my birthday present. Technically I shouldn’t have got anything!

 

Remember Yahoo!? There was a point in time when they were pretty cool. I have to admit, I can’t remember the last time I went to a Yahoo! affiliated website. There’s definitely a growing collection of basket-case tech companies, with Yahoo! and RIM most notably in there. It seems increasingly likely there’ll be need for a bigger basket, soon, to fit HP in as well.

Ahem, I digress. So, Yahoo! management sent out a reassuring memo to staff, but it’s in corporate-speak, so I thought I might summarise it a little. I’ve grabbed the text from All Things D’s article, here, so you don’t have to flip back and forth.

Dear Yahoos:

In our recent all hands meeting, we talked about the Board’s strategic review to help return the Company to a path of robust growth and industry-leading innovation. While our teams are working to evaluate the many opportunities by which Yahoo! can continue building on our success, all kinds of people have been — and will continue — speculating in the media about where that work is headed, so we thought it best to provide you with some additional context directly from those of us who are closest to it. We don’t have specific news to share with you today, but we are committed to communicating with you directly from time to time — especially given the level of external swirl — so that you know where we are in the process. You can expect periodic updates from us and we encourage you to communicate with us as well.

Hi!

At the heart of what we are doing is our belief that Yahoo!’s core strengths are not only relevant to where users are going today, but can serve as a foundation for the next phase of our company’s growth. Consider our strengths: we have 680 million users worldwide. We have nine of the #1 properties in the U.S., and we are a leader in display advertising. Our brand is iconic — we are not the only ones who bleed purple. By whatever measure you want to use — engagement, quality of products and services, our value to our advertisers — we all feel that we have what it takes to succeed. Also, our Asia assets remain one of our top priorities and we continue to work well with the teams there. As you may have seen, Alibaba Group has just announced a liquidity event for its employees that reflects a continued appreciation in its value, and therefore of the value of our stake.

By “growth”, we mean “shaving slices off like we’re in the deli business”. Henceforth, as well, whenever we use the word “we”, we mean the “royal we”.

What Yahoo! needs to do better — and we’ve talked about this — is accelerate innovation, reignite inspiration, and give our users what they want now — great content that is engaging and easy-to-use on any device and provides an experience in which they can participate and contribute. Perhaps most importantly, we need to anticipate what they will want next. That is the path to enhancing the value of Yahoo! for all of its stakeholders, including its users, customers, shareholders, partners and Yahoos everywhere. Our strategic review is designed to help us map out the best way to achieve that.

Think faster, and smarter!

At this point, we cannot offer many specifics about the Board’s review; we’ve just gotten started. You should know that the entire Board and management team are fully aligned and unanimous in their views regarding the scope of this work. Allen & Company was a logical choice to help us in this review, because they have been one of our advisers for some time, and this is familiar territory for them. Achieving success in our sector is intrinsic to what they do for a living, and they will be constructive partners.

We don’t know what we’re doing yet.

Our advisers are working with us to develop ideas that we will pursue proactively. At the same time, they are fielding inquiries from multiple parties that have already expressed interest in a number of potential options. We will take the time we need to select and structure the best approach for the company, its shareholders and employees.

We’re paying some people lots of money to tell us who in the company we should sell to another company. You’re all OK, with that, right? Cool.

In addition, as we announced previously, the Board has commenced a search for a permanent Chief Executive Officer. That process also continues.

We can’t find anyone who wants the job. Hang on, is that Apotheker dude free now? Does anyone have his number?

When we have updates that we can share we will do so. There will be plenty of rumors and speculation as different parties try to advance their agendas in the media — but it is important that we not be distracted by the rumors and speculation.

DON’T LOOK BEHIND THE CURTAIN! DON’T LOOK BEHIND THE CURTAIN! WE FORBID YOU TO LOOK BEHIND THE CURTAIN!

You are instrumental to the success of our business — we can’t do it without you. While we will move with a sense of urgency, this process will take time. Months, not weeks. We know that’s a lot of potential distraction, but we believe it will be worth the wait. We are forging a path to a next phase of growth for Yahoo! that feels like our best days: fun, full of possibility, and always in search of how to deliver the new thing people want from us. Together, we can write the next great chapter in the Yahoo! story and secure our place as one of those rarities: an internet company that endures.

Please don’t quit. The only tangible assets we have left for sale are you!

 

Capital punishment is based on two flawed assumptions:

  1. People are infallible:
    • Justice is fallible. Life is replete with examples of justice failing.Bought judges, judges with their own agendas, etc. The same conservatives that would argue judges are infallible will usually say that a gay judge can’t consider matters about gay rights, etc.
    • The state is fallible. Not only is it not the case, but it’s only in repressive regimes such as China and North Korea that you’ll get situations where it is assumed that the state is infallible. If the state were infallible, you wouldn’t need the the “checks and balance” process with the legal system.
    • A jury is fallible. Despite the best intentions, juries can be bribed, they can be swayed by their own personal opinions, and they can be swayed by lawyers who know their client is guilty but who are still obligated to argue their innocence.
    • Police are fallible. This is not the case. Most police are good, hard working, honest people. But this is not guaranteed. History is replete with stories of crooked cops, or cops with agendas.
    • Witnesses are fallible. (Suggested by mw1414 as an addendum). Legal cases are often premised around the notion of proving that witnesses are fallible, or might be mistaken, etc. If this is incorrect, then the testimony of any witness should simply be accepted as fact.
  2. You’re kicking the problem to a higher power. Most fundamentally of all, capital punishment is premised on the notion that you’re “sending” the person onto judgement by a higher authority. It’s like throwing a woman into the water tied down by rocks. If she floats, she’s a witch. If she sinks, she’s not. It’s cheap superstition.

We can generally accept the risks of all of (1) if the judgement is reversible, or at least correctable. Someone may be incarcerated for 20 years for a crime they didn’t commit, but if justice prevails, they can be released, and likely compensated. If they’re six feet under, or their ashes scattered to the wind, nothing can be done.

Further, any country that advocates the separation of church and state cannot premise a punishment on the basis of it flinging someone on to a higher power for “ultimate” judgement. With that premise removed, it must be acknowledged that the ‘punishment’ is, in fact, state sanctioned revenge, instead.

Capital punishment is inherently evil.

 

There seems to be something suitably ironic in the fact that the first appointment that I could get with my GP in order to start the “I think I’ve got a mental health issue” discussion happens to be my birthday. Since it’ll be followed by a birthday dinner with my two best friends, I guess that day will end up being all about balance, though.

It’ll also mean I’ll be able to say “Hell, I lasted 38 years before…”, but there’s already now that analytical part of me ticking away in the back of my head, which is thinking “Maybe that’s not something to be so proud of”. Any of you who know me have probably already seen it in action – it’s the bit where I’m wall flowering: sitting back, taking things in, observing. So there’s a detached observation that’s causing me to wonder how these discussions will go, what the diagnosis (or diagnoses) will be, and what the treatment path will be.

I’m probably not ready to discuss some of those paths that self-analysis part of me are taking, yet. (Though it’s fair to say that given there’s a number of diagnosed manic depressives in my extended family, if there’s any genetic predisposition towards that, well, you get where I’m headed there.) No, I’m not going to walk into a doctor and say, “I think I have <x> syndrome” – it’s one thing to do a bit of diagnosis by Google when there’s an irritating cough that won’t go away, or some other physical malady. But the mind? I’m not going to introduce the risk of a failed diagnosis into the one part of me that I happen to enjoy spending time with most.

But still, while there’ll be part of me that’ll be shaking and practically shitting my pants to sit down and start that discussion with my GP next week, there’ll be that “mini-me”, in the back of my head, watching and listening and trying to predict the direction that conversation, and future ones, will go. Step right up, step right up, place your bets, folks.

 

Crazy world

Earlier in the week I blogged about going to an RU OK forum, leaving with much food for thought, and needing to do some processing.

It’s funny how you can come up with all sorts of rationales and sophist responses as a shield against facing up to reality. When you’ve been doing that for quite a while, it becomes second nature, but that doesn’t make those responses any truer.

For years my response to “Are you OK?” or “How are you going?” has regularly been something along the lines of “I’m coping” – a neat little bit of sophistry. Having had some time to process the information from the forum though, the one thing that stuck most for me was the notion of a “window of cope”.

And yesterday, I came to the conclusion that my “window of cope” has shrunk to levels that are definitely no longer healthy. There’s always been a partial shame in hiding these emotional issues, but I was surprised how cathartic it was to say to a friend yesterday via IM chat, “I think I’m approaching the time where I have to consider that I need to see someone professional.” Aside from a little tear here and there when listening to a sad song, or watching something sad, it actually let me cry, and cry properly. Significant, much? I think the last time I cried real, gut wrenching sobs would have been when I was 18, or maybe even younger. I’ve always suppressed it. It’s probably not the strength I’d always insisted to myself that it was.

“Crazy ride” of course is disingenuous. I don’t really think of myself as “crazy” – well, when I’m not slumping, I don’t – but, like any other medical condition, it’s finally time to admit that there’s something slightly awry in how I think.

I’d not be entirely honest with myself and my friends if I blogged about everything else except this – so, allow me the melodrama of calling it a “crazy ride”, and feel free to watch the ride from time to time as I work out a solution.

Step 1 – this coming week, it’s time to make a doctor’s appointment for the non-physical.

 

 

 

 

 

The Supreme Court in the United States has issued a last minute stay of execution for a man in Texas, after:

“jurors were told he posed a greater danger to public safety because he is black.”

Not only that:

“The justices acted on an emergency appeal after Texas Gov. Rick Perry and state judges refused to intervene.”

(Supreme Court halts Texas execution – latimes.com.)

Within the week, we’ve had Michele Bachmann insist that the HPV vaccine may cause mental retardation (causing me to wonder if this is true, whether she was catapulted through the Forest of HPV Vaccine Syringes and hit every one on the way through), and seen evidence that Rick Perry thinks that it’s OK to go ahead with executing someone who was sentenced partly because he was black.

Dear America – a lot of you may not like Obama, but at least he isn’t a mentally deficient arsehole like your headline grabbing GOP candidates.

 

I give you…

Muammar Gaddafi

They say the greatest humiliation that can happen to a dictator is when his people start laughing at him.

If any recent dictator is more ridiculous looking than Muammar Gaddafi, I’d be surprised.

 

I definitely have tendencies that left unattended can head in the direction of OCD. Clothes lines, in particular, are a headache for me. I have to work really hard to avoid a situation where any item of clothing hung up with more than one peg has to use the same coloured pegs.

So, since I keep an eye out for my OCD tendencies, I thought I’d make a quick list out to help others spot whether they too have OCD tendencies. Here it is:

  1. You start a list of 7 items and try to work out how to turn it into 10 items because that’s a nice even number.
  2. Not being able to work out a way to go to 10 items, you start writing the first item, but half-way through, go back and revisit this 10-item thing.
  3. You think a little more about how to make it a 10 item list by jotting down the first 7 items and trying to work out what you may have left off.
  4. You re-write the list in alphabetical order in case that helps you come up with something else.
  5. You re-write the list by apparent priority since alphabetical order didn’t help.
  6. Since re-writing by apparent order didn’t help, you go back and re-write into alphabetical order again.
  7. Then you notice a spelling error, so you re-write the list again.
  8. Once you finish writing the list, you realise an ‘s’ looks like a 5. You try to write over it but each time you do it looks worse, so finally you start writing the list all over again.
  9. Your pen runs out half-way through the rewritten list ,and not having another pen of exactly the same colour, you start afresh with the new pen.
  10. You realise you’ve done things similar to anything on this list.
© 2012 unsane Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha