My career centres around enterprise level data protection, to the point that I wrote a book about it, and maintain a blog about it. I’m not talking security and anti-virus, though I have a typical paranoid IT person’s awareness of these items – I’m talking backing up and (if necessary) recovering your data.

Sometimes, once people find out what I do (“backup and recovery”) they ask me how they can best backup at home. This is something that I sometimes struggle to advise in, simply because I tend to take an enterprise approach even to home data protection. So, I’m not going to make my tips about “You should use program X” or “You should use cloud provider Y” – choosing what to use is different from knowing how to do it.

So, that being said, I can give you 10 key tips to keeping your home data safe:

  1. Keep yourself organised.Honestly, this is the most important thing you can do – have a logical and consistent layout to where you store your data. Don’t just dump things on your desktop and hope to sort them out later, or save files to whatever random folder a File|Save dialog box offers. Have a directory/folder structure that is organised enough to make sense to you, without being so anal retentive that it drives you nuts and you start to disregard it.
  2. Know how much you’re backing up. You need to get an understanding of how much data you’ll be backing up. Are you just going to be backing up your email and documents, or your iTunes library all the videos you’ve taken, all the photos you’ve taken, etc.? You can’t make a decision about what backup product to use if you don’t know how much data you’ll be backing up.
  3. Know how much it’ll cost. Classic example – some people just blithely back up to the ‘cloud’ – i.e., over the internet, to something like Mozy or Crashplan. This might be OK for you if you’ve got a small amount of data, but if you’ve got a lot, then bear in mind that you may blow out your upload limits, or take months to complete. When it comes to backup, cost appears in at least two ways: literal dollar value, and amount of time taken. Be aware of both.
  4. Some apps require special backups. For instance, if you’re using Microsoft Outlook or something like that, you can’t backup your mail while your mail program is active. Ask around, or touch base with IT people who use the same platform as you, and find out whether it’s safe to back your application data up while the apps are running.
  5. It’s not a backup if it’s not tested. Don’t just run whatever backup process or program you choose to use and blindly trust that it’ll recover the data when you need. Do some test recoveries when you’re first setting up to reassure yourself it can be done, and then try to remember every now and then to do a test recovery to make sure it’s still looking OK.
  6. It’s better to backup a little bit more than not quite enough. This is typically the very first thing we learn in data protection. Don’t go crazy and backup stuff you know you’d never recover, but on the other hand, if you’re not 100% sure of something, err on the side of caution. It’s better to use a few extra GB of backup space than to find out later you really, really needed something that you’ve now lost.
  7. Backups should be automated. As a backup consultant, the best thing I think Apple ever introduced into their operating system was Time Machine. It allows for fully automated backups to run every hour, with an easy to use recovery interface. One of the first things we learn in backups is that if you have to manually run a backup, it won’t get run. You don’t use your computer to back it up – you use it for the web, or photos, or social networking, etc. Make sure whatever backup option you come up with runs automatically. You should be able to see when it’s active, or easily check that it’s happened/have it report to you when it’s complete. If you can manually run a backup too – e.g., after you’ve just say, imported 30GB of photos – that’s good, but you need it to run automatically 99.9% of the time.
  8. Remember: Backup is Insurance. Doing a backup is like taking an insurance policy. You don’t get to the end of the year and think “damn, that was a waste of money, I never made a claim!” when you take out home and contents insurance. You think “Another good year”. Consider backup the same way.
  9. Is your backup safe? Safe has dual meanings here: is it safe from something that might take out your actual data? Do you for instance, store it right next to your computer? If so, then it’s safe from the hard drive in your computer failing, but it’s not safe from something affecting your house. Consider this when deciding how you’ll store your backup. The second meaning of safe is this: what if someone steals your backup, or it gets lost? (E.g., if your data is small enough that you’re just backing up to a portable hard drive.) If that backup contains your bank account details, etc., then you’re practically giving away information, unless you do some form of encryption.
  10. If you change backups, make sure to safely and securely dispose of the previous ones. You may even want to consider this in advance when choosing what sort of media you’re going to backup to. For instance, I made the mistake for a while of doing archival backup to DVD. When I was no longer doing this and needed to get rid of the DVDs, I had to scratch/destroy the surfaces of each one. With 800+ discs, that took a while:

Dead discs

 

 

Daring Fireball linked this morning to an Amazon report stating that their Kindle eBook sales are now eclipsing their paperback sales.

I find this to be disturbing for one simple reason: none of the eBook retailers deserve this sort of sales. In fact, rewarded with it, they’ll probably make minimal efforts to improve their browsing experiences, and leave us all worse off as a result of it.

Or to be more blunt: the experience of browsing an eBook store, be that Kobo, Kindle, iBook or any of the others, sucks – for large values of “suck”.

This can be best represented visually. Let’s picture a bookstore; the items in green are the ones eBook stores are good at; the items in orange are the areas eBook stores suck at:

eBook Stores SuckNow, I don’t mean those individual orange sections to be literally interpreted; more – the green bits are the what they get right, and comparatively, in size, to a regular book store, the orange bits are what they get wrong.

Let’s see what they’re all good at, first:

  • They’re very good at telling you the best sellers, or the most popular (depending on the mix of paid vs free titles);
  • They’re great at delivery; you buy, you get. Same as a retail store, but it’s available to you 24×7.

That’s it. So what do they suck at?

  • They’re poor at letting you search by author, or title. I’d be reluctant to say they’re even OK at this. It’s poor. In a world where we can conduct rich searches in almost any electronic form, they offer the poorest search interfaces you can find. Limited combination of terms, poor use of quotes to keep words together, etc.
  • There is no casual browsing experience.

I’d suggest that eBook stores primarily work at the moment due to one of the following factors:

  1. People who will read any shit they find just looking at the best selling list and buying.
  2. People who want to read the latest releases looking at the latest release list and buying.
  3. People who come looking for a specific title or author.

But if you step back and think about how bricks and mortar book stores have worked, more than 50% of the store occupants are not people who fall into that category. The people who fall into the above three categories are the “in and out in under 10 minutes” variety. They have a purpose, they’re going in, and they’re going to leave again. They’re like the grocery shoppers who need to go and buy one or two things in order to cook a specific meal.

Where’s the allowance though for the casual browser? The person who say, wants to walk along the entire computer section, or the entire Sci-Fi/Fantasy section, and casually look at all the spines, or all the little notes underneath that staff have placed saying “great read!”, and other such visual cues. There are no visual cues to the eBook experience if you’re not going to a green section. It’s all spartan, and antiseptic. Where are the kids sitting in an aisle staring up at the spines looking for the reddest one they can find and then peeking at it? Where are the thinkers who want to go to the history section and learn about something entirely new? Where are the bibliophiles who have a spare hour and want to grab an armful of new books to take home and devour, but have no idea before they walk into the store, what they’ll walk out with?

Look for instance at iBook, which has, from an aesthetic perspective untied to required function, a really pleasant interface. Here’s how you browse the Sci-Fi/Fantasy section:

Browsing Sci-Fi/Fantasy with the iBook App

And here’s browsing a specific author:

It’s like walking into a store with an eyepatch on one eye, and a loupe on the other. You only get to see the smallest, magnified window, at any point in your experience. It’s not just blinkering, it’s nigh on a form of bondage. When compared to a standard book store, you’re going from the most extreme levels of freedom you can get in browsing to some of the most restricted forms I can imagine while still claiming to be “usable”.

This was covered, referring to social media, Google, etc., only a couple of months ago, in the TED Talk, “Beware online ‘filter bubbles’“.

eBook stores are perfect examples of filter bubbles.

They do not deserve our respect, yet – and they certainly do not deserve the level of sales that Amazon are claiming. Aside from any argument about level of content (which, for anyone with a serious back collection of books, is laughably poor), they wrap us up and blinker us and just let us see the most popular things, while the true book browsing experience withers on the vine.

If this is what “book buying” will be about in 10 years time, it will be a sad and clinical sort of experience.

 

Forgotten memories

Lost in a sea of DAT(a)

Scratch disc

Vision impaired

The key to all my data

 

Tuesday May 17 is the International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia, otherwise known as IDAHO. I am proud of my sexuality, and refuse to accept that homophobia and transphobia have a place in a civil, caring society.

The rank stench of homophobia still wafts into society on a daily basis, regardless of the country or the culture. It can be out in the open, via discrimination or physical assault, or it can be pervasive and subtle, such as what happened to me only 2 weeks ago:

I was walking out of the local liquor store with a case of cider. As I walked out, a young boy, maybe 8 or 10 years, asked his father, who was walking past, “Daddy, what’s cider?”

The father answered “It’s like beer, but only girls and fags drink it.”

That’s the sort of talk that creates another homophobe, so I turned and confronted the father, in front of his son, and said “Excuse me, but I prefer to be called gay.”

Homophobes are typically bullies, and all bullies are actually cowards when they’re confronted. So the reaction he had to that was as if I’d thrown a bucket of ice cold water on him.

Don’t think that homophobia isn’t a real problem.

 

 

So goodbye Alice in Wonderland
Goodbye yellow brick road
There is a difference between dreaming and pretending
I did not find paradise
It was only a reflection of my lonely mind wanting
What’s been missing in my life

- Jewel, “Goodbye Alice in Wonderland”

We now have a house to go to in Melbourne, and so this chapter of my life is rapidly coming to a close.

It’s actually been a fairly lengthy chapter. After all, I left my home town, Parkes, in 1992, and other holidays, I’ve never been back – I stopped living there all those years ago. So I’ve been living in the Newcastle/Central Coast region for the longer period of my life – by one year, but still, the majority of my life has now been spent within an 80km radius of our current house.

When I first blogged about the move I talked about the realisation that a comfort zone can, sometimes, become a rut. The greater reflection of how this can happen occurred to me when I realised I’ve never lived anywhere I actually wanted to for the lifestyle. I’ve always lived somewhere for an externally imposed reason:

  • Parkes – I was born there, that’s where my family were;
  • Newcastle – I went to University there;
  • Central Coast – It made working in Sydney convenient.

The lyrics for the first chorus in Jewel’s song “Goodbye, Alice in Wonderland” struck me a while ago as consistent with the move. I’ve lived in this general area for 19 years, but never until recently questioned why I was living in the area. Don’t get me wrong – I have some great friends here; in particular, it’s going to hurt leaving Kimma, but my reasons for being here have never actually been my own. So the lyrics aren’t a reflection of this region being a bad one – just simply a reflection that it’s not the region for me. (Or indeed, for us.)

Melbourne is the first move I’m ever making as a lifestyle choice. I’m not doing it because it’ll make work more convenient, or make studying possible, etc. This time my need is a personal one, rather than an imposed (or imagined imposed) one. That makes a huge difference.

So, Goodbye Alice in Wonderland.


Goodbye, Alice in Wonderland

 

I’ve been playing around this weekend with DSLRemote, an iPhone app that allows me to remote-control my Canon 50D while it’s plugged into my laptop. Since my camera itself doesn’t actually support a wireless remote, this is as closed to wireless as I can get.

It was a good opportunity to do an updated pic of my sleeve, now that the healing is complete:

Sleeve

What’s particularly funny is the reaction that I get from people between the tattoo and the mohawk. Trust me, I’m mild mannered; but when people see the above, plus the mohawk, you’d swear I was menacing them with a knife. Someone actually asked me the other week, “What gang are you a member of, and are you the leader?”

And it’s not even a big mohawk:

Mohawk

Please! The baby boomers pioneered the comb over, and blue rinse washes, and a number of other fashion and body image horrors that we’re still dealing with today. I think the world can survive me having a mohawk and a tattoo.

You can trust me.

 

Most of the time I just click on my spam folder once a day, hit CMD-A then Del. Occasionally though, one of the feculent little things will stand out for humour value. Here’s the one that made me laugh today:

I've been a very bad boyClearly, I’ve been a very bad boy.

But I might refrain from opening that attachment, #kthxbai.

 

Remember how the RIAA used to want exorbitantly large fines per single song ‘stolen’ by file-sharers?

Sometimes they’d ask for $1000 per song, sometimes they’d ask for tens of thousands per song.

It would be a fitting, karmic punishment if Sony were fined the same amount per end user whose details were stolen in the recent security outages.

What’s good for the goose is good for the gander, after all.

 

Apple Magic Trackpad

 

I’ve been using the Apple Magic Trackpad since October 2010; it had already been out for a few months, and I was vacillating as to whether I’d get one or not. Sure, it looked nice, but I was already using the Magic Mouse (the most superb mouse I’ve ever used, I might add), I just couldn’t see the justification in going to the Magic Trackpad.

Yet, curiosity got the better of me and I lashed out in October to acquire one of the little beasties for my Mac Pro. Now, I also have a Mac Book Pro, which I use extensively, and so I’m very used to using a trackpad.

So now, around 7 months later, I’ve finally made a decision about the Trackpad.

It’s a dud. A version beautiful dud. There are three key flaws with the Magic Trackpad:

  • Jumping – The trackpad is incredibly sensitive to the touch. While you’re actually using it to move around, it’s reasonably accurate for coarse granularity; however, as soon as you lift your hand, you run the risk of jumping the cursor to a completely different location on screen. At least several times a day, I have my cursor jump across multiple windows, halfway across a 1920×1200 desktop – usually just before I’m about to make a pointer click. It’s slowly driving me nuts.
  • Accuracy – I said before, “it’s reasonably accurate for coarse granularity”; however, when it comes to fine granularity control, its effectiveness exponentially drops off. Video editing, for instance – frame by frame selection, is an exercise in extreme frustration.
  • RSI – I’ve suffered from RSI for years. The keyboards introduced by Apple a few years ago were miraculous, since with their minuscule key travel, they made typing a dream again. I had previously been using a Kinesis Ergo keyboard – the Apple keyboard allowed me to consign that to the dust. (See here for some details on that change.) However, after months of using the Magic Trackpad, I’m satisfied that it is extremely ergonomically unsound when you have to keep your hand on the unit for anything but the shortest period of time. I can comfortably keep my hand on a mouse with reasonably intensive work for periods of half an hour or more without even thinking about it. About five minutes is my upper limit on the Magic Trackpad. Five minutes before my fingers cramp up. Maybe it’s the angle, or maybe it’s the hand positioning compared to a regular trackpad on a laptop, but ergonomically, the Magic Trackpad is an exercise in pain.

Tomorrow I’ll be switching backover to the Magic Mouse, and keeping the Magic Trackpad as a spare.

Sorry Apple, this product is a dud.

 

Much has already been said on the killing of Bin Laden, and I don’t want to go into September 11, the merits of the war in Afghanistan or the history of the man himself.

The interesting question that comes out here is the ethics of state-sponsored killing. I’m a pacifist, and firmly believe that the state does not have the right to execute its own citizens – capital punishment, to me, is quite simply, evil.

Yet here we have an individual who planned the deaths of thousands of people, and continued to advocate the deaths of as many more. Leaving aside any twisted interpretation of religion, a moral person who believes that killing is wrong should not hesitate to say that Bin Laden was a mass murderer and as much as any other mass murderer (if not more) warranted the moniker of ‘evil’. (In general, murder is certainly evil – though I am a proponent of euthanasia, just to complicate matters.)

So, did Bin Laden deserve to die? Was it ethical to kill him?

This is where the shades of grey really come into play, and I’m not trying to suggest I have an answer – just reflecting on the ethical conundrum I’m left with at the end of this day.

My first thought is that capital punishment is premised on passing the buck. It’s premised on having a higher authority (i.e., ‘god’), and sending the ‘sinner’ for judgement. As an atheist, I don’t believe in god, and hence I believe that capital punishment is a cop-out. Premised on sending the soul on for eternal damnation, if there is no follow-up judgement, it actually rewards the wrong-doer by not having to deal with the long-term consequences of their actions. Sure, it takes their life away, but that’s it – there’s nothing more, and they die in the belief they were right, not to mention possibly a martyr to whatever twisted cause they advocated.

Permanent incarceration though? A punishment that runs the time of capture to the time of their death by natural causes, seems to me at least to be a much more “ultimate” punishment than a quick and easy death. The person who has done the deed has voided their social contract, denied themselves their rights, and so being kept alone, bored, and stuck with their own thoughts and no interaction with others, for the rest of their lives, is a punishment far greater than execution.

So, where does this leave me with an ethical dilemma? Consider what I believe in:

  • I’m a pacifist;
  • I believe capital punishment is unethical/evil;
  • I believe that state sponsored killing is unethical/evil;
  • I believe that murder is evil, and mass murderers are also evil.

So – here’s the rub: given all of the above, is there an exception in a situation where a patently evil person continues to elude capture, continues to advocate murder, and as such cannot be permanently incarcerated? In this case, was it ‘OK’ to kill Bin Laden given the only alternative would have been to allow him to escape, and therefore continue to kill?

Life is never black and white, and while I can understand that some might have jumped up and down cheering at the death of Bin Laden, I can’t divorce myself from the ethical dilemma that I have in the situation.

I actually hope I never can, either.

© 2012 unsane Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha